Cezar Cretu vs Noah Perfetti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 May at 07:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Cretu vs N. Perfetti

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cretu 1 - 0 Perfetti
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cezar Cretu winning 2 and Noah Perfetti winning 0. The last match between Cezar Cretu and Noah Perfetti was at the M15 Bistrita, 09-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Cezar Cretu getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cretu | 1 |
| Perfetti | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Bistrita(05-09-25)
C. Cretu vs N. Perfetti H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 68.36% (296-137) | Career Total W/L | 52.07% (88-81) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Cretu vs N. Perfetti Match Preview:
- On second serve performance in the past six months, Perfetti has a slight edge, winning 45.24% of points compared to Cretu's 41.48%. Is this difference significant in predicting a winner? It might be, as second serve points are crucial.
- When returning second serves, Cretu performs slightly better with a win rate of 48.96%, versus Perfetti's 47.03%.
- For first serve returns, Cretu marginally leads again, at 31.31% compared to Perfetti’s 30.93%.
- In pressure situations, Perfetti saves more breakpoints at 51.63%, compared to Cretu's 46.41%.
- Overall, Cretu has a superior win record over the last year with a 63.08% success rate, whereas Perfetti has won 46% of their matches.
- Both players excel on clay, though Cretu shows a higher winning percentage of 69% versus Perfetti’s 56%.
- Average opponent ranking reflects Perfetti facing tougher competitors with an average rank of 315.98, in contrast to Cretu’s 421.75.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Cretu's odds are better, having won 56% of such sets, whereas Perfetti only wins 25% of them.
- Cretu slightly surpasses Perfetti in break point conversion at 41.53% versus 39.8%.
Editorial Prediction (May 9, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent trends, Perfetti showcases a stronger performance in second serve points, an edge influencing match outcomes.
Cretu, while showing proficiency in returning and overall match success, faces challenges under pressure, reflected in break point save percentages.
Both athletes perform well on their preferred clay surface, with Cretu holding a noticeable advantage in terms of winning percentage.
Perfetti’s experience against higher-ranked opponents could offer strategic depth, while Cretu’s superiority in deciding sets signifies resilience.
Given these factors, despite Perfetti's strengths on paper, Cretu's consistent match wins and clay proficiency suggest they are more likely to win the upcoming match.
Cezar Cretu vs Noah Perfetti Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Cretu vs N. Perfetti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:10:56 | Average Match Time | 1:10:56 |
| 74% (26/35) | 1st Serve % | 70% (43/61) |
| 77% (20/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (22/43) |
| 89% (8/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (33/61) | Return Points Win % | 20% (7/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Cretu Recent Matches Played
N. Perfetti Recent Matches Played

C. Cretu vs N. Perfetti Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.36% (296/137) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.07% (88/81) |
| 64.04% (627/352) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.77% (200/179) |
| 55.41% (5051/4064) | Games Win/Loss | 51.30% (1774/1684) |
| 60.00% (36/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 69.84% (257/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.98% (80/71) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 787 | Aces Total | 101 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 868 | Total Double Faults | 99 |
| 1:26:36 | Average Match Time | 1:9:46 |
| 474.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 329.23 |
| 64% (15171/23635) | 1st Serve % | 70% (4936/7075) |
| 66% (9964/15171) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (2853/4936) |
| 50% (4234/8464) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1001/2139) |
| 47% (1327/2840) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (360/801) |
| 44% (10609/24034) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3072/7155) |
| 100.00% (4/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.13% (34/30) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71.07% (258/105) | Futures W/L | 52.07% (88/81) |
| 68% (288/424) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (86/167) |
| 53% (50/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 65% (80/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 92% (274/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (87/73) |
| 8% (274/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (87/14) |
| 27% (157/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (82/15) |